Citation audit — Open Knowledge Format bundle (2026-07-01)

Scope: the architecture page and all six leaf pages of the Open Knowledge Format bundle. Verified against: the canonical OKF specification, v0.1. Posture: selective / verify-embedded-facts — the claims are mostly conceptual, with essentially no statistics.

Result

0 confirmed-wrong, 0 could-not-verify across all seven pages.

Every claim cited to the specification is faithful to it: the definition, the "read a file, read OKF" accessibility, type as the only required field, unknown-field tolerance, the concept-ID rule, prose-borne links, the # Citations provenance convention, the three non-goals, and the versioning plan. The rich verification layer (evidence ledger, per-claim checking, build gates) is correctly presented as a Knowledgeville extension, not as core OKF v0.1. The MCP claim was confirmed against the live endpoint.

Notes

• The comparison to knowledge graphs, schema.org, and RAG is the bundle's own analytical framing; the specification does not name those formats. The pages present it as our framing, and the sourced citation attaches only to the spec's stated non-goals. Correct under this bundle's posture.